
Other than to name a few sources, such as Freud, she fails to provide evidence in the narrative to support her claims.

Hill relies upon outdated psychoanalytic concepts to explain various events. The perhaps greatest weakness is the attempt to wrap everything up in a pop psychology framework. Despite being described as a scholarly work, the material does not live up to that standard.

I don't think I would be interested in reading something else by Francis Hill. Would you be willing to try another book from Frances Hill? Why or why not? I would very much enjoy listening to her again. Ms McCaddon is wonderful at reading the material. Would you try another book from Frances Hill and/or Wanda McCaddon?
